The Burning Bridge

Star summary: 

3 stars-- moral compass, characters. Unimpressive writing & unlayered plot.

The second book in the series follows hot on the heels of the first book, time-wise. While I still find the dialogue & humor a bit forced, and the movement of the plot to be less-than-smooth, the characters are engaging enough to make me want to read the next book. I am enjoying the relationship of Horace & Will progress from competitors who do not get along to trusted allies and best friends.

Cautions? Violence typical with feudal society and evil oppressive invading armies.

The bottom line of this book?

Talking points:
-- Students familiar with Roman history will delight to recognize the historical Horatius Cocles, who, along with two of his officers, defended a bridge against the Etruscans by destroying it behind himself. Horace, Will and Evanlyn, anyone? Discuss the similarities between the two stories, and how elements are often recycled in good stories-- why might that be?
-- Making a stand that may utterly fail, but is our only hope, is a motif that is repeated throughout literature. Why does this matter?
-- How are Horace and Will learning to complement each other instead of compete with each other?

3 star: solid morals, & believable, worthy characters. 1/2 star for writing, which has occasional humor. 1/2 star plot, which is engaging and enjoyable to the Classically educated child (who will love the echo of a myth they recognize), but fairly limited in its "layering" (it's almost purely uni-dimensional action).

Star rating: 
 
 
 
 
 

Comments

So i think it should be mentioned that John F. gets much better with his character development AND plot as the books go on... That's one reason I think the series is so good... each book tells a story but it gets you deeper and deeper inoi their world... it's like quicksand.. kind of shallow at first but it will suck you in!

Add new comment